Monthly Archives: April 2010

Rational Unified Process Best Practices

The RUP describes how to effectively deploy commercially proven approaches to software development for software development teams. These are called “best practices” not so much because you can precisely quantify their value, but rather, because they are observed to be … Continue reading

Posted in RUP | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Upstream IT Reference Architecture and RUP Software Development

Today’s oil and gas industry needs a common IT reference architecture for use by upstream organizations, system integrators (Sis), solution providers and software development companies. A single architectural approach will encourage simplification and unification in the upstream sector. It will … Continue reading

Posted in .NET, Oil & Gas, RUP | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

RUP artefacts in a context of phases

Software development process according to the Rational Unified Process is broken intro phases. Each phase has a cycles, each cycle working on a new generation of the product. The results in a cycle in general calls artifacts. Summary description of … Continue reading

Posted in RUP | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

What’s new in .NET Framework 4.0 for business?

Of course new .NET Framework 4.0 has features that could be used by developers mostly. In general for business .NET 4.0 Framework main focus is on performance and security improvement. There are some features that could be useful for end … Continue reading

Posted in .NET, Business | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Rational Unified Process Core Workflows: Business Modeling

Rational Unified Process Core Workflows: Business Modeling Based on Rational Software White Paper “Best Practices for Software Development Teams” The core process workflows in RUP are divided into six core “engineering” workflows: Business modelling workflow; Requirements workflow; Analysis & Design … Continue reading

Posted in RUP | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Mapping XP phases in to RUP model

General XP’s phases are exploration, commitment and steering. At the release level, these align with particular collections of activities, called workflow details in the RUP Project Management discipline. Exploration and Commitment phases could be mapped into the Plan for Next … Continue reading

Posted in RUP vs XP | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Subcontracting in the RUP Scope

The Subcontracting Scenario Concept We can define typical scenarios to understand the multiple subcontracting strategies based on the Rational process. Each scenario has a remarkable characteristic that predominates in the set, and many other secondary characteristics that result from the … Continue reading

Posted in RUP | Tagged , | Leave a comment