Tag Archives: RUP vs XP

Is there an XP equivalent of RUP’s activities?

Posted on July 6, 2010 by Andy.Starzhinsky

Yes there is, but XP’s “activities” are not formally identified or described. you’ll find it headed “Define requirements with stories, written on cards” and then throughout the chapter is a mixture of process description and guidance about what use stories … Continue reading →

Posted in RUP vs XP | Tagged , | Leave a comment

RUP vs XP. Why doesn’t XP need all of the RUP artifacts?

Posted on June 4, 2010 by Andy.Starzhinsky

One reason is that XP doesn’t have the scope of RUP. This is quite intentional: XP is about programming to meet a business need. How that business need occurred and how it’s modeled, captured, and reasoned about is not XP’s … Continue reading →

Posted in RUP vs XP | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Mapping XP phases in to RUP model

Posted on April 8, 2010 by Andy.Starzhinsky

General XP’s phases are exploration, commitment and steering. At the release level, these align with particular collections of activities, called workflow details in the RUP Project Management discipline. Exploration and Commitment phases could be mapped into the Plan for Next … Continue reading →

Posted in RUP vs XP | Tagged , , | Leave a comment